In re Novozymes South Asia pvt.ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) The products ‘Rhyzomyx’ and ‘Rhyzomyco’ manufactured and supplied by M/s. Novozymes South Asia pvt. ltd., is covered under Entry Sr.No.61 of Schedule-II of Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 of the CGST Act, 2017 on which rate of GST chargeable is 12% (6% SGST +6% CGST). […]
In re Shivani Scientific Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) The product ‘Micromanipulator system’ manufactured and supplied by M/s. Shivani Scientific Industries pvt.ltd. is classifiable under Tariff item no. 9011 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975). The said product is covered under Entry No. 184 of Schedule-IV of Notification No.01/2017-Central […]
In re Global Vectra Helicorp ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) In terms of the valuation provisions under GST legislation, amount recovered as reimbursement (at actual) by the applicant M/s. Global Vectra Helicorp ltd. from the customer, for the fuel procured on behalf of the Customer is required to be included in the value of services provided by […]
In re Dipakkumar Ramjibhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether supply of Fly Ash Bricks and Fly Ash Blocks are covered under Chapter heading 68159090 and liable to taxed @ 5% and @ 12% respectively under the GST Act? (1) The product ‘Fly Ash Bricks’ manufactured and supplied by Dipakkumar Ramjibhai Patel (M/s. Mahalaxmi Cement products) […]
In re Adarsh Plant Protect ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both.( ‘Sprayer pumps’ (manually operated), Stoves) (1) The product ‘Sprayer pumps’ (manually operated) manufactured and supplied by M/s. Adarsh Plant Protect ltd. are classifiable under Tariff item No.84248100 of the First Schedule to […]
Remuneration paid to indepedent directors or those directors who are not the employee of the appellant is taxable in hands of the appellant on reverse charge basis. The part of the declared as salaries in the books of the appellant and subjected to TDS under Section 192 of the IT Act are not taxable.
AAR held that Bank can avail ITC on fifty percent of GST paid on DICGC premium, as it is statutorily required for the bank to obtain insurance of deposit, which has only been accepted by it in the course of its business or furtherance of business. Claim is allowable under Section 17(4) of CGST Act, 2017.
In re Hazari Bagh Builders Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) The Applicant Company is registered in the State of Rajasthan and having GSTIN in State of Rajasthan. The Applicant company has entered into a long term Lease Agreement of 99 years with RLDA for undertaking residential & commercial development along with development of financial infrastructure […]
In re North Shore Technologies Private Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Question 1- Whether the subsidized shared transport facility provided to employees in terms of employment contract through third party vendors, would be construed as “Supply of service” by the company to its employees? Ans: Answered in negative. Question 2- If the answer to above […]
In re Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) Now coming to the value of taxable supply in case of advance payment, we observe that explanation given in the sub Section 2 of Section 13 of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that-: “Explanation- For the purpose of clause (a) and (b)- (i) […]
