ACIT Vs Ms. Indus Valley Housing, (ITAT Chennai) The question arises for consideration is whether the investment made by the assessee in the land at Nolambur is a stock-intrade or capital asset? If the land is stock-in-trade, then naturally the profit on sale has to be considered as income from business. If it is considered as capital asset, […]
Ambattur Infra Developers prevail in ITAT Chennai. Payments for leased space and services to be considered under ‘income from business.’
Payment of commission to overseas agents for marketing, procurement of orders and systematic market research was not liable to TDS as the same was not liable to tax in India as per Section 9(1)(vii).
Sonal Steels Trading Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) Here admittedly, assessee was not maintaining any books. There was thus no question of recording any money, bullion, jewellery or any entry in any books. It is not disputed that assessee had not disclosed any receipts from bill trading before the date of search to the […]
Main object of the assessee firm, as laid down in the partnership deed, includes leasing of industrial park hence the income of the assessee both from leasing the space as well as providing maintenance services had to be considered only under the head income from business.
DCIT Vs M/s. Prestige Garden Estates Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Deduction was allowable under section 36(1)(iii) on interest on borrowing to pay earnest money deposits (EMD) to purchase properties being lands, flats, etc. as the same was for purpose of assessee’s business of acquiring properties. Held: In the present case, assessee-company was engaged mainly […]
Century Seeds Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) With reference to the finding of the Ld. CIT that the Form 3CM and 3CL are not filed which are mandatory, it was the submission that assessee has filed Form 3CM in letter format issued by DSIR granting renewal of recognition up to 3 1.03.2015 by the […]
As far as the deduction u/s. 54F of the Act on the question whether if under a JDA multiple flats are given to the owner whether deduction u/s.54F of the Act can be given, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and the other decision cited before us supports the plea of the […]
DCIT Vs Aurobindo Pharma Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) We have considered the rival contentions and perused the case law placed on record. In the decision of Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd (supra) the Coordinate Bench did not allow the expenditure spent outside the R & D unit but the Bench has not considered the explanation introduced with reference to ‘Clinical Trials’. […]
M/s. Royal Challenger Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT Assessee challenges the addition on account of contribution made to Cricket Academy of Rs.45 lakhs holding it to be capital expenditure. The assessee made a contribution of Rs.45 lakhs to Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) for the purpose of creating a cricket academy. The assessee was also a Franchisee of BCCI-IPL, which […]
