Northern India CA Federation Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes (Delhi High Court) Northern India CA Federation has filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court against non-extension of Tax Audit Report and the relevant Income Tax Return filing due date for Financial Year 2017-18 (i.e. A.Y. 2018-19). FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER […]
Merely because the assessee had sold the shares at face value in a distressed situation it could not be presumed that the assessee had engineered the transaction to manage its tax liability. Therefore, AO was not justified in disallowing the claim of assessee for set off of long-term capital loss on sale of unquoted equity shares against long-term capital gain on the sale of property.
Where overseas HO was not liable to pay any tax on interest remitted by assessee, there was no obligation to deduct TDS under section 195(1) on such remittance because TDS provisions are attracted only when such remittance results in taxable income.
Priyatam Plaschem Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case ITAT explains Law on whether share capital/ share premium received by a Company from investors can be assessed as ‘unexplained cash credit’ in the light of judgements of the Courts and Tribunal. In the case in hand Considering the facts of the case, in […]
Holding period should be computed from the date of issue of the allotment letter and not from the date of the conveyance deed (Rasiklal M. Parikh vs. ACIT 393 ITR 536 (Bom) distinguished)
Virvati Devi Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi) The Ld. CIT(A) correctly noted that possession of the property in question was not transferred at the time of Agreement to Sale. After the Agreement to Sale the SDM vide order dated 26.02.2009 changed the land use and declared the land as non- agricultural. The sale deed dated 24.03.2009 was […]
Loesche India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Delhi) The record reveals that the assessee had paid the insurance premiums of the employees’ family members in terms of employment Rules framed by the assessee-company there for. Therefore, it can hardly be said that the impugned expenditure were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose […]
Assessee has failed to disclose the identity of the recipient of gifts either during the assessment proceedings or during the appellate proceedings. The ld. CIT(A) has also examined the records and found that the assessee also failed to establish the business exigencies of the appellant vis-a-vis the aforesaid gifts.
Where assessee made payment of commission to non-residents outside India for procuring export orders, income of non-resident agents could not be considered to accrue or arise in India and therefore, there was no liability of assessee to deduct tax at source.
he submission of the assessee that she is just an investor and as she received some tips and she chose to invest based on these market tips and had taken a calculated risk and had gained in the process and that she is not party to the scam etc., has to be controverted by the revenue with evidence.