Explore ITAT Pune resolution in ACIT vs. Rohan & Rajdeep case. Deduction dispute u/s 80IA(4) for infra projects analyzed. Reopening validity examined.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling in Neelam Dhingra vs. DCIT. Invalid reassessment notice against a deceased person. Legal fallacies leading to quashing of the order.
ACIT Vs Rameshbhai Jivrajbhai Desai (ITAT Ahmedabad) During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessment order passed under Section 153A of the Act was held to be void ab initio and thus there is no addition in the […]
If an agreement for sale of immovable property is not registered, it does not amount to transfer in view of the 2001 amendment carried out to section 55A of the Transfer of Property Act and also simultaneous amendments to section 17(1A) and 49 of the Registration Act, 1908
Aditya Saraf HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is observed, as per the investigation conducted in relation to the shares of the company, on which, the assessee offered long term capital gain, it was found that it is a penny stock company. It was also found that due to price manipulation and rigging, there was […]
Baljeet Yadav Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) It is evident from the assessment order and impugned order that the assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny under CASS for examination of cash deposits made in the bank during the demonetarization period. It is prima facie not clear whether it was a limited scrutiny case or a detailed […]
Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) We find the issue of payment of excessive price on purchase of sugarcane by the assessee is no more resintegra in view of the judgment of Hon‟ble Supreme Court in CIT Vs. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. (2019) 103 taxmann.com 57 (SC). The Hon‟ble Apex Court […]
ITAT held that deduction under Section 80IB of Income Tax Act, 1961 allowable on scrap generated during the manufacturing process.
ITAT held that penalty under section 271AAA(1) cannot be imposed in a case where the assessee has offered the undisclosed income in the statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act, specifying the manner in which such income has been derived and if the assessee pays the tax along with interest of such income.
G. V. N. Hospitals Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) In the present case, admittedly there is difference in net profit as shown in ITR and tax audit report and same has not been satisfactorily explained by the assessee. The Assessing Officer, after considering relevant facts has rightly made additions towards difference in net profit. The learned […]
