ACIT Vs Ecocat India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) There is no quarrel on the proposition that the DSIR has approved the weighted deduction for capital expenses. Those expenses were in a sum of Rs. 2,97,57,596/- which is acknowledged in the assessment order by the AO. What has not been permitted u/s 35(2AB) of the Act […]
Royal Accord Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In a taxing statute one has to look merely at what is clearly said in the section. There is no room for any intendment. There is no concept of equity in tax law. Nothing is to be read in, nothing is to be implied. One has […]
Sahyadri Vividdhodesha Areca Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Held that object of section 80P(4) was to exclude cooperative banks that function at par with other commercial banks and noted that as primary agricultural credit societies are not entitled for obtaining a banking license would not be hit by this provision. Facts- Assessee is a society registered […]
Church’s Auxiliary For Social Action Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) In the case of India Brand Equity Foundation vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (E), Trust, Ward-II, New Delhi [(2012) 23 com 323 (Del)] it was held that amount spent outside India for participating in a fare held outside India cannot be treated as application of […]
CIT(A), NFAC has erred in not granting an opportunity to the appellant bank to present the case through the video conferencing as specified under the Faceless Appeals Scheme 2020
Sneh Developers Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) As per the AO, the assessee has not filed return of income and hence notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been issued owing to cash transactions exceeding Rs.10,00,000/-. The AO held that the assessee has not given any details with regard to the […]
As per section 246A of the Act, the assessee has a right to file an appeal before CIT(A) against the intimation under section 200A of Act.
S.K. Agarwal (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is an admitted fact that during the AY 2015-16, the assessee HUF sold a plot of land and earned capital gain which it claimed exempt under section 54F as the assessee purchased a residential house. The only cause of denial of exemption by the Revenue is that […]
AO has made addition u/s.56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of the Act, towards difference between guideline value and consideration paid for purchase of property as unexplained investment.
Assessee has assigned reasons for condoning delay is that, Assessment order been misplaced by Advocate & not handed over the same to assessee
