The ITAT deleted the adjustment in respect of international transaction of Payment of Interest on Fully Convertible Debentures by upholding the contentions that LIBOR was not applicable as there was no lending/borrowing in foreign currency and assessee had issued rupee dominated debentures.
Merely, because the assessee’s PAN number was mentioned as he was the Director of one of the company, the purchase cannot be said to be made by him when the purchase has been shown in the P&L account by the said company itself as well as part of the closing stock of the said company, namely, Iscon Procon Pvt. Ltd.
Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee has claimed legal expenses and travelling & conveyance expenses before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer mainly disallowed the expenditure claimed by the assessee on the ground that the legal proceedings was undertaken in respect of the charges framed against the Directors and shareholders of […]
Manish Goel Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT find that in the case of Swati Bajaj (supra), the facts before the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court, were that the assessee has claimed exempt income under section 10(38) of the Act at Rs.28,23,500/- from sale of equity shares of a listed company namely Surabhi Chemicals & Investment Limited. […]
CSR expense disallowance is restricted to expenses incurred by assessee under statutory obligation u/s.135 of companies Act 2013 and it doesn’t apply to expenditure incurred in discharge of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on voluntarily basis.
It has come on record that the department has itself accepted interest paid to the lender banks @ 14.75% in case of secured loans are against unsecured loans availed from Shri Grewal. That itself suggests that the impugned interest rate @ 10% is not excessive so as to attract the impugned disallowance/addition.
ECL Finance Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) As per sub-section 3 to section 92CA inserted with effect from 1.6.2007 time limit for TPO to pass the order is within the period of sixty days prior to the date of completion of the order as per section 153 of the Act. Since reference under section 92CA […]
ITAT held that Once cash flow statement is not controverted by the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT[A], the addition of such cash deposit is not valid
Due to invalid notice service and non-service of notice to assessee, the assessment order made by AO is therefore bad in law and subject to being quashed.
ITAT Surat held that the addition on account of unaccounted profit on estimation basis, in trading/ manufacturing of diamonds, restricted at 10% of the sales in view of CBDT instructions vide circular no. 2/2008 dated 22nd February 2008.
