Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (Indore) Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore) The assessee has challenged the penalty to the tune of Rs.1,50,000/-levied under Section 271B of the Act. The assessee, a Government company, wherein appointment of Auditor in the case of the appellant was governed by the provision of section 619(2) of the Companies […]
ITAT held that Rule 128(9) of the Rules does not provide for disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) in case of delay in filing Form No. 67; (ii) filing of Form No. 67 is not mandatory but a directory requirement and (iii) DTAA overrides the provisions of the Act and the Rules cannot be contrary to the Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that rule 10B(2)(d) of the Income Tax Rules provide that the company is in the wholesale trading and retail trading have to be considered separately for the purpose of comparison.
ITAT Mumbai held that loan lying in the proprietorship concern books of the assessee is converted as gift during the year under consideration hence there was no fresh receipt of money. Accordingly, addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that exemption under section 10 of the Income Tax Act not available as the said land was non-agricultural land as it failed to fulfil twin conditions for qualifying as agricultural land.
ITAT Chandigarh held that for claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act primary motive of incurring such expenditure should be directly relatable to the earning of income falling under the head income from other sources. Such expenditure are deductible even if there is net loss.
ITAT Ahmedabad assessee has duly submitted banks certificate disclaiming the existence of such bank accounts belonging to the assessee. Hence, addition of cash deposited on such non-existing bank account unsustainable
ITAT Mumbai held that as assessee is having sufficient own funds hence investments which yield exempt income can be presumed to be made out of interest free funds. Accordingly, disallowance of interest in terms of rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Income Tax Rules unsustainable.
ITAT Kolkata held that non-compliance to summons issued u/s 131 of the Act or non-appearance of the directors of the subscribing companies cannot be basis for making addition as the assessee has proved the identity, creditworthiness of the investors and genuineness of the transactions.
Bhavmeet Singh Bhatia Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) AO noted that the assessee has not filed the return of income for AY 2011-12 whereas the copy of the return of income available in assessee’s paper book clearly reveals that the assessee did file the return of income for AY 2011-12. It is also clearly discernible that […]
