ITAT held that invocation of provision of 263 to correct section under which penalty is leviable or not is beyond the power vested under section 263 of Income Tax Act,
Unitech Wireless (Tamilnadu) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT in assessee’s own case has considered identical issue and held that no TDS was to be deducted in case of roaming charges u/s 194J of the Act by holding as under:- “22. To conclude, The primary issue in the appeal was whether the roaming charges […]
ITAT find that if the expenses are proved to be un-genuine on verification, the AO ought to have disallowed the entire expenditure. Accepting 75% of expenditure as allowable and the remaining 25% disallowable on ad-hoc basis cannot be considered as a reasonably rational order.
Velankanni Constructions Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee being resident firm is stated to be engaged in civil construction. The assessee could not produce bills or voucher for blue metal jelly purchase, brick purchase and sand purchase. The reasons adduced were that the assessee undertook work at remote places and was dependent on local supplies. […]
It must be grasped that judiciary is respected not on account of its power to legalize injustice on technical grounds but because it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do so.
ACIT (Intl. Taxn) Vs Allscripts (India) Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is pertinent to note that Section 201(3) specifies the time limit in respect of TDS for residents only. The CIT(A) observed that the order dated 25.03.2019 is beyond four years in light of Hon’ble Delhi High Court decision in case of NHK Japan Broadcasting […]
Definition the Profits derived from the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic, in the India- Singapore DTAA is exhaustive enough not only to include the air passengers but also mail, livestock or There is nothing mentioned in the India-Singapore DTAA to make an inference that the profits from transport of air passengers should not be covered under Article 8 of the Indo-Bhutan DTAA.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that undisclosed income declared during the course of search is treated as gross income as genuineness of expenditure claimed against the same is not doubted by AO.
ITAT Pune held that disallowance of 1% is reasonable as admittedly the share transactions were manipulated through entry provider stockbrokers in order to obtain fraudulent income by rigging share prices and selling them in order to justify the unaccounted income of the assessee.
ITAT Mumbai held that reopening of assessment alleging that assessee has failed to provide fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment is bad in law as details already made available to AO during the course of scrutiny assessment proceedings.
