Navneet Dutta Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessee filed his original return of income on 10.01.2012 for the AY 2011-12 and in the said return due to clerical/typographical error, the assessee could not claim loss from house property. Later on the assessee revised the return of income on 18.06.2012. Assessee has filed rectification application u/s 154 […]
Assessing Cloud Computing Tax Dispute – AWS Inc. challenges ITAT Delhi on Royalty & FTS, seeks conditional stay on outstanding demands.
Non-specification of limb of the notice would render section 271(1)(c) penalty proceedings invalid. ITAT held that notice u/s 271(1)(c) is omnibus notice, thus defective which goes to the root of the matter. Accordingly the appeal of the assessee stands allowed.
While processing of TDS statement, the late fee, if any shall be computed in accordance with provisions of Section 234E of the Act. As a corollary, prior to amendment under Section 200A of the Act, levy of fee under Section 234E during processing of TDS statement is not tenable.
Mere submission of amendment by post to Charity Commissioner cannot be considered to be due registration with Charity Commissioner. What is required to be shown by assessee is that amendment carried out to trust deed has been registered with Charity Commissioner and his approval has been obtained.
ITAT Delhi held that received towards undertaking restrictive covenant of non imparting service to any other person and not to share associated goodwill of medical practice being in the nature of non compete fee is a capital receipt and not taxable under provision of the Income Tax Act.
ITO Vs Manumati Boro (ITAT Guwahati) Revenue has challenged the finding of the ld. CIT(A) deleting the addition for undisclosed sale and sustaining the addition only to the extent of net profit element embedded in the alleged undisclosed sale. We notice that the ld. Assessing Officer based on the seized records impounded during the course […]
DCIT Vs Bhilwara Energy Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The assessee filed return of income declaring a loss of 16.13 crores. The assessee company suo moto disallowance an amount of Rs. 9.9 crores consisting of interest of Rs. 9.5 crorees and other expenses of Rs. 40 lakhs on account of disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. […]
It is settled proposition of law that proceedings initiated and orders passed in the name of the dead person is not valid. However, it appears that the AO was not aware of the fact of death of the assessee and the copy of death certificate is furnished for the first time before us.
ITAT held that lease rental received by assessee on leasing of alloys cannot be treated as royalty in terms of India-USA DTAA & provisions of section 9(1)(vi)
