ITAT held that when two views are legally possible and Assessing Officer adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous for CIT to invoke jurisdiction u/s. 263
Assessee has made a vague claim of medical reasons without any supporting evidences to justify his stand that he was suffering from ill-health and Doctors advised him to take rest.
Before issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act, approval of the higher authorities is a mandatory statutory requirement.
Assessee cannot include interest received on deposits as business receipts and estimate net profit under section 44AD on such interest income
Assessee is an illiterate farmer and claims that he was not properly presented in assessment and appellate proceedings. Moreover, assessee claims that he was misguided by consultant
Read about Ansal Properties vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case. Penalty not sustainable on QIP and 80-IB disallowance. Full text of ITAT Delhi order
Assessee tried to recover forfeited money and when all efforts to recover forfeited money went in vain the same been claimed as expenditure
ITAT Amritsar held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act is beyond jurisdiction as the amount is already declared as turnover and the said turnover is reflected in the books of account.
ITAT Jaipur held that as the activities carried out by the appellant (Rajasthan Para-Medical Council) are not in the nature of trade, commerce or business, hence registration under section 12AA should be granted.
ITAT Mumbai held that payment of employee’s contribution to PF & ESI beyond the due dates is not allowable as deduction. Accordingly, the same is an incorrect claim and therefore it falls within the scope of prima facie adjustment u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act.
