ITAT Raipur held that mere non-reference by AO about the cash transaction entered into by the assesse doesn’t render the assessment order passed by AO as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, revisional proceedings u/s 263 unjustified.
ITAT Cochin held that benefit of deduction of 7.5% of the total income is available to co-operative banks under clause (viia) of section 36(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Hyderabad held that non-generation/ non-quoting of Document Identification Number (DIN) in the order will render the order invalid and will be treated as never to have been issued.
ITAT Mumbai held that the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education (MSBTE) would fall under the definition of state as per Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment order passed on non-existing entity (dissolved company) is liable to be quashed as the Assessing Officer has the knowledge of the dissolution of the company.
ITAT find from assessment order that there has been no abnormal cash deposit and assessment order is based on estimation and strange logic and without any legal basis and hence, held to be legally invalid.
Admittedly, the assessee had got the books of account audited for the first time for the relevant assessment year. Prior to the relevant assessment year, the assessee was under the bonafide belief that only the gross commission receipts are to be taken as turnover for the purpose of audit.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on the taxation of on-money received on the sale of agricultural land, examining the exemption and tax implications under the Income Tax Act.
Explore the ITAT Pune ruling on the disallowance of car expenses incurred by a private limited company for personal use by directors, citing relevant case law and legal principles.
Explore the ITAT Ranchi ruling on penalty imposition for non-audit of books, analyzing the distinction between maintenance and audit requirements under Sections 44AA and 44AB of the Income Tax Act.
