ITAT Amritsar orders restoration of Bashir Ahmad Sofi’s case due to violation of natural justice. Ex parte orders quashed, fresh assessment directed.
Delve into the intricacies of the case Smt. Sekar Jayalakshmi Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai), analyzing the discrepancy between Section 68 and Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.
Delve into the Sharada Mohan Shetty Vs ITO case, analyzing the intricacies of Sec. 54F exemption claim, construction delays, and legal implications.
ITAT Delhi held that the revenue authorities are not entitled to appropriate the taxes which have been paid in excess of the due taxes to be paid by the assessee. Accordingly, reducing refund by withdrawing benefit of TDS on advance rent received is unjustified.
ITAT Mumbai resorted back the matter to AO with direction to find out from the relevant PF authorities about the term every month as mentioned in Clause 38 of the Employees Provident Fund Scheme (EPF Scheme).
ITAT held that in the absence of an ascertainable amount and identifiable payee, the machinery provisions of recovering tax deducted at source falls flat
ITAT Delhi held that hollow and cosmetic approval accorded under section 153D of the Income Tax Act without application of mind is unenforceable in law and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment proceedings merely on the basis of information received from the investigation wing is invalid and bad in law and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition by way of adjustment and intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act on debatable and controversial issue is beyond the scope of Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that assessee would be entitled for deduction on account of bad debts written off as part of the sales amount is not received.
