ITAT Amritsar held that in absence of cogent and satisfactory explanation, delay of 781 days in filing of an appeal cannot be condoned. Accordingly, condonation of delay not granted.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search.
ITAT Pune held that late fees u/s 234E of the Income Tax Act can be levied only prospectively with effect from 01.06.2015.
ITAT Mumbai held that effluent water treatment shall be considered as water treatment plant and accordingly, the same is eligible for deduction under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that common interest earned from investment in co-operative banks is not eligble for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) or 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Pune held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act duly leviable in case the additional income is disclosed in ITR filed u/s 153A and such additional income is originated out of seized material.
ITAT Chandigarh set aside the addition u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act to the file of AO to test the enforceability of agreement to sell as per relevant statue vis-à-vis fresh affidavit.
Yeddula Harsha Vardhan wins appeal against DCIT at ITAT Hyderabad, as Rs. 4 lakhs addition under section 69A is deleted. Read the full verdict here.
ITAT Pune held that excess sugar cane prices over and above the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) fixed by the Government is to be determined as per latest statutory amendment in Section 155(19) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that for invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 it is necessary to satisfy twin conditions i.e. one being that order should be erroneous and second, such order should be prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Non-satisfaction of the conditions renders the proceedings unsustainable.
