ITAT Bangalore held that legal and professional charges being incurred towards business are allowable as revenue expenditure.
ITAT Delhi held that interest receipt under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS Scheme) being capital in nature needs to be excluded while working out the book profits under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of appellant, holding that they had indeed complied with statutory notice and therefore levy of penalty under section 272A(1)(d) of the Act was not justifiable
ITAT Delhi’s verdict in the case of Gawar Constructions Co. Vs DCIT, illuminating the importance of clear particulars in the imposition of tax penalties. Understand how discrepancies between the initial ‘satisfaction’ and the grounds for penalty can lead to quashing of penalty orders.
ITAT Delhi’s decision in case of Sumita Devi Vs ITO, showcasing how chronic health conditions can impact filing of appeals and lead to ex parte orders.
ITAT Surat’s in case of Nileshkumar Chhaganbhai Vasoya Vs ITO, held that legal illiteracy of a common man is not an excuse for delay in filing appeal
ITAT Mumbai’s recent decision in Anilkumar Champalal Jain Vs. ITO, where assessee’s lack of active engagement with tax authorities led to additional costs. Explore importance of taking tax obligations seriously and potential consequences of negligence.
ITAT Bangalore held that proviso to Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act is not applicable in the present case as sufficient internal cash accruals available during the impugned year are more that interest free funds advanced to the sister concern.
ITAT Cuttack held that claim of exemption of long term capital gains (LTCG), from sale of equity shares, under section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 allowable as requisite conditions satisfied.
In the landmark case of ACIT vs Kamal Kapoor, ITAT Delhi invalidates reassessment order for lack of thorough examination and due diligence
