Requirement to deposit net consideration as per Section 54F(4) not attracted if assessee has purchased a new residential house within due date specified under Section 139(4)
In Sunrise Broking P. Ltd. Vs ITO, ITAT Ahmedabad abolishes penalty over additions made to interest on income tax refund, recognizing no concealment or inaccuracy in the income particulars.
ITAT Delhi upholds the deduction of foreign travel expenses of directors in the Arms Communications Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT case, emphasizing the role of these expenses in business growth and prospecting.
Ajit Kumar Khan Vs DCIT case at ITAT Ranchi clarifies that late filing fees for GST returns cannot be added summarily through intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
The ITAT Chennai in Jamal Mohideen Haroon Imran Khan Vs ITO case allows a delay of 227 days in appeal filing due to the death of assessee’s advocate during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Judgement of Garve Motors Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune), addressing the disallowance due to non-submission of business vouchers.
Explore the ruling in the case of Kartick Das Bairagya Vs ITO at ITAT Kolkata, which clarifies the conditions for non-imposition of penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that direction by CIT(A) to AO to take appropriate action for not deducting TDS from the perquisite in respect of interest free loans given to directors and to take appropriate action to tax the perquisites u/s. 17 of the Act is in excess of jurisdiction conferred by section 251 hence deleted.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit unsustainable as cash proceeds already reflected in Profit & Loss account, hence addition u/s 68 will amount to double taxation.
Held that in the absence of any incriminating material found or seized during the course of search and seizure proceedings, the additions made by the AO during the course of reassessment under section 153A of the Income Tax Act are without jurisdiction.
