Mere completion of assessment under section 143(3) doesn’t automatically merge the intimation under section 143(1) with the assessment order
ITAT Ahmedabad condones Saraswati Trust’s late appeal due to consultant error, remands case for fresh consideration under Section 12A.
ITAT Chennai ruled to correct an arithmetical error made during scrutiny assessment, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the full Section 10AA deduction.
ITAT Delhi held that law does not confer any power on the Assessing Officer to either withdraw or modify or substitute one assessment order passed by him earlier with another assessment order subsequently.
Finance Act, 2017 removed clause (i) of section 92BA, effectively nullifying any decisions made by the Assessing Officer under this section. Reference to the TPO under section 92CA also becomes invalid
ITAT Chennai rules in the case of Kannappan Vijayalakshmi vs ITO, stating that the mere non-acceptance of a claim by the assessee doesn’t mean automatic penalty under section 270A(9)(a). Explore the detailed analysis and implications.
Read how ITAT Ahmedabad orders fresh adjudication due to non-cooperation of tax consultant in furnishing property investment details in Pravinchandra Naranbhai Patel case.
ITAT Delhi held that software licence fee received as reimbursement, in absence of a Permanent Establishment in India, is not taxable. Accordingly, addition towards the same deleted.
ITAT Bangalore remanded the matter back to AO for fresh consideration as assessee didn’t proved existence of business exigency in making payment in cash and AO didn’t carried necessary enquiry before making addition u/s 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained expenditure merely on the basis of suspicion without any other support is unsustainable in law.
