Analysis of ITAT Chandigarh’s ruling on service of notice in income tax cases, emphasizing the importance of proper notification to taxpayers.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Delhi rules no penalty under 271(1)(c) for a bonafide assessee who revised and added interest income. Analysis of Pramila Tarneja Vs DCIT case.
ITAT Chennai held that addition based merely on presumptions and assumptions and without allowing cross-examination is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on the information received from the investigation wing is valid and sustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that the date of dispatch from the adjudicating officer is relevant for determining the limitation period. Accordingly, assessment order dispatched beyond time limit prescribed u/s. 153(1) is barred by limitation.
ITAT Amritsar held that once source of surrendered income is proved to be business income, the same cannot be taxed as deemed income under section 69 read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the case of Sh. Kuldeep Kumar Vs ITO, where the onus shifted to the IT Department when affidavits verified cash deposit sources. Full ITAT Jodhpur order analysis
Explore the ITAT Chennai order in Srimathi Laxmi Charities vs. ACIT, focusing on non-corpus donations to charitable trusts and the deletion of additions.
Analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in the case of DCIT vs. Red Hat India Pvt. Ltd. regarding revenue recognition and Accounting Standard-9 compliance.
Read about ITAT Delhi’s directive to Assessing Officer to investigate TDS claims and PAN misuse in case of Legend Transport Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO.
