expenditure incurred for organizing sports events are allowable items of revenue expenditure as such events publicise the names of the sponsor.
We are prima facie of the opinion that the activities of the assessee of Banquet Hall Hiring, Hospitality (Restaurants) and Permit Room (Bar) are in the nature of carrying on trade, commerce, or business for consideration, which are hit by proviso to Section 2(15) of 1961 Act.
If the assessee is able to establish that it was only a notional provision which was reversed afterwards, then no TDS liability can be imposed on the assessee.
In a significant ruling, the ITAT Chennai held that the private open terrace attached with residential unit would form part of built- up area for the purpose of computing deduction under section 80-IB(10) of the Income Tax Act if the same was included in the house project approved by the local authority.
The learned Commissioner (Appeals)-3, Bengaluru has erred in not allowing credit in respect of TDS deducted and deposited by certain customers wrongly in the erstwhile name of the appellant (IT &T Technology Services Limited now known as IGATE Infrastructure Management Services Limited) of Rs. 61,84,211.
Since, no specific format is provided under the Act for recording satisfaction for making dis allowance under section 14A, AO was not required to give detailed reasons for invocation of rule 8D(2) in view of the fact that assessee failed to discharge its primary onus of proving nexus between interest-free funds and the investments yielding tax- free income.
In assessee’s case, the bank is not even a member of the society. The nature of the transaction between the assessee and the bank would disqualify application of the principle of mutuality. Therefore, the transactions with the bank who is not even a member of the society cannot be considered as a transaction for which […]
When the business asset of the assessee is let out but after discontinuing the business activity of the textile mill then the rental income cannot be treated as income from house property however the same would be assessed as income from other sources.
The credit of TDS deducted and deposited in the old name and old PAN No. and the credit of the same was not given to the assessee on account of mismatch, though entity is the same.
ITAT has held that right to receive a property is a valuable and a transferable right and falls within the ambit of “capital asset” and hence profit earned on sale of allotment right (without physical possession of the property) is taxable as Capital Gains and not as Income from other sources.
