Pr. CIT Vs M/s. Monsanto India Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Tribunal recorded that the Non Compete Agreement was part of the agreement for the sale of the business. Under this Agreement, the Assessee could be seen to have transferred the right to manufacture the product in question. The Tribunal, therefore, was of the opinion that […]
Sheel Chand Agroils (P) Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) Rule 8A of the CST Delhi Rules makes the issuance of manual forms redundant. All forms now are generated electronically through the website of the DTT and qua particular transactions/suppliers. He accordingly submits that there was no occasion for […]
Pr. CIT Vs Green Associates (Gujarat High Court) Assessee had claimed deduction in respect to the income arising out of such activity under section 80IB (10) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim mainly on the ground that the assessee was not the owner of the land and the approval of […]
Deduction u/s 80IA eligible when herbal product is manufactured from herbs, manually and with the use of some chemicals and small machinery.
Since assessee failed to demonstrate that the conditions of the bid for purchase of gold jewellery required assessee to effect payments in cash and there was no explanation as to what stopped assessee from effecting payments through banking channel, therefore, AO was justified in disallowing the cash purchase of jewellery under section 40A(3).
Merely because the investment was considerably large and as noted, several corporate structures were either created or came into play in routing the investment in the assessee through P5AHIML would not be sufficient to brand the transaction as colourable device.
Onora Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the prosecution of the petitioners for the offence punishable under section 276B of the Income Tax Act could be sustained without determination of the liability of the petitioners under section 201 of the Act? In the given case, it was […]
CIT (E) Vs M/s Beant College of Engineering & Technology (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The Tribunal while dealing with the objection of the CIT(E) that the assessee had been claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act and, therefore, should not have filed the application under Section 12AA of the Act, had noticed that […]
What was given to the retiring partners was money representing the value of their share in the partnership and no capital asset was transferred on the date of retirement. Therefore, no capital gains or profit could arise & section 45(4) had no application.
Jai Laxmi Cement Co.(P.) Ltd. Vs Union Of India (Allahabad High Court) Rule 120A of the CGST Rules, 2017 provides that where a registered dealer submits a declaration electronically in FORM GST TRAN-1 within the time period specified in Rule 117, Rule 118, Rule 119 and Rule 120 he may revise such declaration once and […]
