Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri. Natesan Krishnamurthy Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Natesan Krishnamurthy Vs ITO (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Since assessee failed to demonstrate that the conditions of the bid for purchase of gold jewellery required assessee to effect payments in cash and there was no explanation as to what stopped assessee from effecting payments through banking channel, therefore, AO was justified in disallowing the cash purchase of jewellery under section 40A(3). Held: Assessee had purchased gold jewellery worth Rs.34.68 Crores by way of cash in the auction conducted by M/s.M Finance Ltd. AO referred to Section 40A(3) stated that assessee had made cash ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930