It is clarified that in case the petitioner is hampered in any manner from availing the benefit of aforesaid judgment, due to non opening of the Portal by the Respondents, then the petitioner shall be permitted, in the alternative to claim the benefit of unutilized credit in their GST-3B Forms to be filed for the month of January,2020 either electronically or manually.
Bombay HC held that in case, the deductor has failed to upheld the correct details in form 26AS the benefit should be given to the assesssee on the basis of evidence produced before the Department.
P.H. Kumar & Co. Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Court is of the view that the plea of the Assessee ought to have been accepted in the first instance by the AO. The Assessee placed on record the agreement under which it was obliged to bear the loss for shortage of stock. The Assessee also […]
It defies logic as to why such donations cannot be permitted out of 15% accumulation permitted under Section 11(1)(a) itself. There is however rationale for imposing the restriction as contained in the explanation to accumulations in excess of 15%.
It is clarified that in case the petitioner is hampered in any manner from availing the benefit of aforesaid judgment, due to non opening of the Portal by the Respondents, then the petitioner shall be permitted, in the alternative to claim the benefit of unutilized credit in their GSTR-3B Forms to be filed for the month of January, 2020 either electronically or manually.
Intec Corporation Vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court) Plain reading of Section 150 reveals that it deals with a situation where an assessment or re-assessment for a particular year or for a particular person is necessitated by an order passed by appellate or revisional authority or on a reference. In such cases, it may not be […]
It is further contended that petitioner is involved in using data of individuals for creating fake firms to claim Input Tax Credit. It is contended that statement of accountant and brother of petitioner has been recorded, they have also stated that present petitioner was involved in creating fake firm under GST. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the Union of India, I am not inclined to allow the bail application.
A.F. Babu Vs Union of India (Kerala High Court) While it is a fact that the petitioners did not make an attempt to log into the system before 27.12.2017, the cut-off date prescribed by the respondents for uploading the TRAN-1 Form to the web portal, I find that the petitioners were guided by a press […]
It is hereby held that milk chilling and packing service provided by the contractors to the petitioners are exempted by virtue of Serial No.24 of the table to Notification No.11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017.
Vision Distribution Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commisioner, State Goods & Services Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Coming Heavily on GST Department/GSTN Delhi High Court held that The business activity in the country could not be expected to come to a standstill, only to await the Respondents making the GST system workable. The failure of the […]
