Lupita Saluja Vs DGGI (Delhi High Court) It is not in dispute that on the day the impugned order has been passed, the said Judge granted regular bail to the husband of the applicant after spending nearly 50 days in custody who is the person involved in day-to-day affairs of the company, however, dismissed the […]
The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
Ahmed Hassan Muhammed Vs Customs (High Court Of Delhi) The fact of the present case is that prosecution has mixed all the packets and thereafter, sent to FSL for examination, which is contrary to the procedure prescribed under the law. This Court is informed that the petitioner is a Somalian National resident and his Refugee […]
High court directed directed State Government to take appropriate decision on the aspect of inclusion of online gambling and online betting, within the purview of the Kerala Gaming Act, 1960, within a period of two weeks from today.
That the officers conducting search proceedings also forced the management/directors of the company to make the payment of tax, interest and penalty at midnight. In fact the officers themselves have created the payment details in the system and the management was asked to make the payment.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Banu Constructions (Madras High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF MADRAS HIGH COURT The argument on behalf of the appellant is short and sweet: that the first principles of arbitration law do not permit an unreasoned order to be justified by supplementing reasons therefor upon looking into the evidence or […]
Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India And 5 Others (Allahabad High Court) It is pertinent to mention that dealers in the State of Uttar Pradesh falling under the CGST Act/ U.P. GST Act and aggrieved with the orders of first appellate authority under Section 107, have been left remediless inasmuch as Appellate Tribunal […]
WS Retail Services Private Limited Vs State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court) It is the case of the petitioner, undisputed by the respondent that petitioner is not a registered dealer under JVAT Act, 2005 nor has been assessed to tax under the Act. No demand notices were raised against the petitioner as such to the […]
We direct that until decision is taken on the objection filed by the petitioners by respondent No.2, petitioner No.1 shall maintain a balance of Rs. 5,00,000.00 in the escrow account out of the share belonging to the petitioner No.1. In effect, we lift the provisional attachment in so far as petitioner No. 1’s share in the escrow account is concerned subject to maintaining credit balance of Rs. 5,00,000.00 by petitioner No. 1 out of its share and direct that respondent No.4 would be at liberty to transfer / remit the proportionate amount due to petitioner No. 1 to the account of petitioner No.1 and maintain balance of Rs. 5,00,000.00 till the aforementioned decision is taken.
T.R. Sawhney Motors Pvt.Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) T. R. Sawhney Motors Private Limited v. UOI, WP(C) 2138/2019 & CM Appl. No. 10002/2019 (Stay) wherein the Court has relied the judgment of M/s. OWS Warehouse Services LLP vs. Union of India 2018 (19) GSTL 27 (Guj) and stayed the notices issued by […]
