PCIT Vs Mount Kellett Capital Management India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Entire exercise of making transfer pricing adjustments on the basis of comparables is nothing but a matter of estimate of a broad and fair guess-work of the authorities based on factual relevant materials brought before the authorities, i.e., the TPO or Dispute Resolution […]
SPL Gold India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) We have also considered the Assessment Order. It is true that between 20/05/2021 and 25/05/202 1 there was a lockdown in Mumbai and 22/05/2021 and 23/05/2021 were holidays. Therefore, even with a superhuman effort, Petitioner would not have been able to file the huge number […]
Vedanta Limited Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) Facts- M/s. Sterlite Industries (India) Limited has merged with M/s. Sesa Goa Limited with effect form 17.08.2013. Thereafter, the said company namely M/s. Sesa Goa Limited was amalgamated with M/s. Vedanta Limited, the present petitioner, with effect from 21.04.2015. Mainly it was alleged that notice issued under section […]
Pentamedia Graphics Limited Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Facts- The order is challenged by the assessee on account of period of limitation under section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act. Assessee argued that the period of limitation, prescribed under Section 153 (2), to pass an order of re-assessment expired on 12.10.2014. However, the impugned order […]
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court dismissed the Revision filed by the Revenue and upheld the Orders of Tribunal where it sustained the Remand Order passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) as there was violation of principle of Natural Justice in the Original Order passed by the primary authority.
Milestone Brandcom Private Limited Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Bombay High Court) 1. This is another matter where Court’s precious judicial time is spent due to utter disregard for orders and remarkable ineptitude of the Assessing Officer. 2. Petitioner was served with a draft Assessment Order dated 06/05/2021 with a notice by which Petitioner was […]
Assessment order could not have been passed by the Assessing Officer without granting an opportunity to respondent to defend his position or cross-examine the two persons on whose affidavits, the Assessing Officer had relied upon to conclude that respondent had made certain purchases from those persons identified as Hawala Traders.
PCIT Vs JK Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) The only issue that comes up for consideration is with respect to the extent of ad-hoc disallowance to be sustained with respect to bogus purchases. The AO has observed 100% of the purchase value to be added to the income of Assessee, the CIT(A) has […]
It has held that difference in the level of capacity utilization is an accepted principle, though denied in the relevant AY to the respondent. The same cannot, however, tantamount to filing without good faith and due diligence.
Nitin Jain Liquidator PSL Limited Vs Enforcement Directorate (Delhi High Court) A. The Court notes that the reliefs as framed in the writ petition essentially seek a restraint against the respondent from interfering in the liquidation process which had been set in motion. That challenge cannot stand eclipsed merely on account of the issuance of […]
