KVAT registration once cancelled has to be published in two leading daily newspapers at least and the dealer should be informed as per notice in Form No.5 B. Then only the cancellation of registration shall be effective.
Vetrivel Explosives Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) Judgement The Madras High Court has held that credit which remained unutilized on the date of accident in the regular returns filed by the Petitioner, shall be allowed to the Petitioner either by way of suitable credit entry in the electronic cash register of […]
Lokhandwala Construction Industries Private Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) In this case, during the original assessment proceedings, a notice dated 19th October 2019 was issued under Section 142(1) of the Act by which petitioner was called upon to furnish copies of Index II(s) of three flats sold during the year. Petitioner responded by its […]
Delhi HC reviews GST Act conditions for bail in Amit Gupta vs. Directorate case. Focus on ITC availing, reversal, and compliance with bail terms.
Delhi HC sets aside exparte order in Ankit Kaul’s case due to technical glitch. Directs the respondent to refile and pass fresh assessment order within six weeks.
The show cause notice is challenged on the ground that apart from the demands proposed in the earlier proceedings, there were proposals in the impugned order dated 20.12.2019.
Matrix Commodeal Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Calcutta High Court) This writ petition is allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee, since the impugned notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been issued on 31st March, 2021 as appears from record and this […]
Ashvinkumar Ramniklal Jani Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Apex Court in the case of Gangahanume Gowda Vs. Karnataka Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. reported in (2003) 3 SCC 40 has decided the interest on delayed payment of gratuity. It is also held that the same is mandatory and not discretionary. When it is not […]
Indranil Mukherjee Vs State of West Bengal And Others (Calcutta High Court) The Calcutta High Court held that in case of death of an accused the compensation awarded under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused, but an interim compensation awarded under Section 143A of […]
It is declared that there is no conflict between the power to levy GST under GST Act and power of Municipal Corporation to levy advertisement fee or advertisement tax under Section 134 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act.
