The compensation for medical expenses is a matter of reimbursement and hence once the insurance company has chosen to compensate the victim of road accident for medical expenses, the same cannot be once again claimed under the Motor Vehicles Act
The Arbitral Tribunal had thus, articulated the terms of appointment unequivocally and unambiguously. It had made it clear to the parties that its appointment and the proceedings before them would not be governed by ICADR Rules. Accordingly, arbitral tribunal is not bound by ICADR rules for fixation of the fees
It was clear, therefore, that till such time the purchase order was issued pursuant to such acceptance of the offer made by the Petitioner, there was no completed ‘contract’. Consequently, Clause-6.34.1 would not get attracted.
Bhagwan Singh Vs State of Himachal (Himachal High Court) It is concluded that SARFAESI Act and RDB Act shall have overriding effect to provisions of HPVAT Act. Hence, the said property is to be permitted to be transferred in favour of petitioners free from all encumbrances in terms of E-aution. Facts- Petitioners are purchasers of […]
This criminal case is filed by the Official Liquidator under section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 as the accused persons did not file statement of affairs within the stipulated time.
Board of Trustees for Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Vs Marinecraft Engineers Private Limited (Calcutta High Court) The disputes between the parties pertain to the deductions made by the petitioner under diverse heads from the moneys which were due and payable to the respondent. The respondent being a unit entitled to the benefits of the Micro […]
Indus Towers Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court) Having perused the letter dated 9th May, 2022 written by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(2), Jaipur, this Court is of the view that the said Income Tax Officer had no jurisdiction to issue notice dated 14th March, 2022 to propose initiation of reassessment proceedings, […]
Sanjib Das Vs The Union of India (Gauhati High Court) First this Court would like to deal with the question as to whether the Circular dated 11.11.2021 is clarificatory in nature thereby clarifying the Master Circular No.1053/02/2017-CX dated 10.03.2017. A Perusal of the said Circular dated 11.11.2021 stipulates that the concept of pre-show cause notice […]
Ratnamani George Vs Authorized Officer, Canara Bank (Kerala High Court) This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to confirm the sale of the property auctioned by the petitioners after accepting the balance bid amount. 2. According to the petitioners, lured by a publication in the website of the respondent intimating the […]
JSW Steel Ltd. Vs Union of India (Orissa High Court) In view of definition of “Input Service Distributor” contained in Section 2(61), it is necessary that the ISD as an office is required to receive tax invoices towards inward supply. Facts- The Petitioner, being engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of hot and […]
