Orissa High Court held that notice issued u/.s 148A of the Income Tax Act clearly demonstrates that the Assessing Authority had in possession of information about deposit of cash in the banks and hence the same is tenable in law
Calcutta High Court held that the capital investment and resale do not lose their capital nature merely because the resale was foreseen and contemplated when the investment was made.
Petitioner is a Chartered Accountant by profession and after passing the examination, he became eligible to be appointed as an Insolvency Professional by the Committee of Creditors under Section 3(19) of IBC, 2016 for handling the companies under liquidation.
Poonamchand Saran Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) It is not disputed that appeal against cancellation of the GST registration can be filed within thirty days which can be extended by a further period of 30 days. The petitioner Poonamchand Saran filed the e-appeal in time but could not submit the hard-copy. On the […]
Md. Wasim Vs Bengal Refrigeration and Company (Calcutta High Court) The partnership deed containing the Arbitration Clause has not been disputed by the respondents. It is also not in dispute that it is an unregistered partnership deed. The objection of the respondents is in respect of the bar contained under Section 69 of the Act […]
R. P. Buildcon Private Limited & ANr. Vs Superintendent, CGST & CX (Calcutta High Court) As could be seen from the records placed before this Court, we find that three wings of the same department are proceeding against the appellants for the very same period, i.e. financial years 2017- 2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. The learned […]
West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited Vs Sical Mining Limited (Calcutta High Court) In this case application under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed to appoint the sole arbitrator to decide the dispute between the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent has raised an objection that no notice making a […]
ACIT Vs LGW Industries Limited & ors. (Calcutta High Court) Hon’ble Division Bench of Calcutta high Court has dismissed the appeal of the department vide its judgment dated 16th September, 2022 in a dispute relating to denial of Input Tax credit due to cancellation of registration of supplier of goods with retrospective effect. Hon’ble single […]
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that as there is no adverse effect on the economic interest of India, recourse couldnt be taken for coercive process like issuance of Look Out Circular (LOC) interfering with the constitutional right to travel abroad.
It appears that after completing the assessment the assessing officer addressed the PCIT stating that certain error has occurred in the assessment order and requested him to review the order under section 263 of the Act.
