Coromandel International Ltd Vs Union of India and others (Jammu and Kashmir High Court) It is submitted that petitioner, applied for reimbursement by way of Budgetary support for the period, January 2020 to March 2020 and April 2020 to June 2020 before Central Tax Authorities. The Adjudicating Authority illegally and arbitrarily rejected the reimbursement under […]
HC held that, in case of non constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal, petitioner can file a Writ Petition before High Court.
Space Enclave Private Limited Vs Income Tax Department and Others (Madhya Pradesh High Court) Since the jurisdictional issue has been raised before this Court, even assuming an alternative remedy u/S 246 of the Act of filing an appeal is available, it will not operate as an absolute bar for entertaining the writ petition as jurisdictional […]
HC held that it was incumbent on the CT and GST Officer to accept the payment of tax by using electronic credit ledger (ECL).
Delhi High Court held that right to use radio frequency spectrum or its subsequent transfer covered under Clause (j) of Section 66E which was effective from 14.05.2016. Accordingly, compensation received during Financial Year 2015-2016 not leviable to service tax.
Jharkhand High Court held that show cause notice u/s 73(1) on mismatch in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A issued on standard format without strucking off unnecessary particulars or without specifying contraventions is termed as vague.
Any payment towards output tax, whether self-assessed in the return or payable as a consequence of any proceeding instituted under the provisions of GST Laws, can be made by utilization of the amount available in the electronic credit ledger of a registered person
Delhi High Court held that as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to meet the case that it was not entitled to refund as the services provided by it was as an intermediary. Matter is remanded back to Appellate Authority as the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.
Calcutta High Court held that adjusting repair and maintenance charges as well as Municipal Taxes against rent payable without specific agreement between landlord and tenant to do so is unjustifiable.
Kerala High Court directed the First Appellate Authority to entertain the appeals preferred by the appellant against assessment order after collecting amounts due towards Kerala Legal Benefit Fund.
