Facts- Petitioner statedly is a limited company engaged in procuring vehicles from Tata Motors Limited (“TML”) and selling them to dealers within and outside the State of Maharashtra.
Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court) Reversal of Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) on the loss of inputs which is inherent to the process of manufacturing The Division Bench of Hon’ble Madras High Court recently in the case of Eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt limited Vs Asst.Commissioner of CT, Tirupur settled […]
Orissa High Court held that the date when the material was discovered is not relevant. What is relevant is the nature of evidence or material discovered during the inspection. It cannot be utilized for making assessment for other years unless their relevance to any other period is established.
Patna High Court held that sub-section (5A) of section 45 inserted by way of an amendment in the Finance Act, 2017, expressly stated to be effective from 01.04.2018 cannot be treated as retrospective.
Section 206AA cannot be understood to override the charging Sections 4 and 5 of the Act. It has further held that the provision in Section 206-AA has to be read down to mean that where the deductee i.e., the overseas resident business concern conduct sits operation from a territory, whose Government has entered into a DTAA with India, the rate of taxation would be as dictated by the provisions of the treaty.
Sri Priyanga Agencies Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Madras High Court) In a case between Sri Priyanga Agencies and the Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, the Madras High Court has issued a common order. The court has disposed of the main writ petition and two related Writ Miscellaneous Petitions (WMPs). […]
DEN Networks Limited Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court) HC held that We have to reiterate that the inconsistent provisions in the Bihar State legislations which were sought to be continued for one year or till the amendment or repeal by the respective State Legislatures, by virtue of Section 19 of the 101st Amendment, […]
Chhattisgarh High Court held that waiver of mandatory pre-deposit under section 35-F of the Central Excise Act 1944 not accepted. However, alternative prayer to grant extension of time limit for pre-deposit accepted and three months further time is granted.
In the case of J. Kishorekumar Vs ITO, Madras High Court examines tax notices issued to deceased assessee’s legal representative, offering detailed insights into legal implications and proceedings.
Gujarat High Court held that in case reopening of assessment based on material which satisfied to harbour reasons to believe that there was escapement of income, then, such reopening of assessment is justifiable.
