Madras High Court held that rejection of rectification application filed under section 161 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 justified as the petitioner has not cooperated in the course of assessment.
Kerala High Court held that provisions of section 64(1)(v) of Income Tax Act clearly states that income accruing or arising in the hands of a minor child will be added to the parent’s total income.
Rajasthan High Court reassures petitioner’s right to a fair response in the case of Sodhani Sweets Pvt. Ltd. Vs Joint Commissioner, dismissing worries over the GST authorities’ consideration of the reply.
Calcutta High Court case between Saru Kankani and Union of India, focusing on the consequences of unjustified delays in filing legal actions.
Madras High Court, in case of Aqua Excel Vs Assistant Commissioner, allows petitioner to approach appellate authority with a delayed appeal under Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax.
Madras High Court condones the delay of 10 days in filing appeal as the petitioner was unaware of the orders as the orders was sent to the Consultant’s email id.
The Rajasthan High Court orders a prompt decision on a GST refund application pending for 9 months, setting a limit of 60 days for a resolution in the case Rajcomp Info Services Ltd Vs Union of India.
Delhi High Courts in Sesame Workshop Initiatives (India) Pvt Ltd vs Union of India held that interest should be allowed due to inordinate delay in refunding GST amount to petitioner, setting a precedent for similar cases in future.
Gujarat High Court held that merely because the petitioner inadvertently paid Rs.2000/- less towards principal outstanding amount of tax, it cannot be denied the benefit of ‘Vera Samadhan Yojna, 2019’.
Allahabad High Court in Delhivery Limited Vs State of U.P held that consigner or consignee has right to challenge GST order passed against Driver of Vehicle by presenting documents proving their ownership of the goods.
