The Delhi High Court has quashed an income tax notice in the case of Jagannath Haldar Through vs. PCIT. The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not taken into account the petitioner’s reply while passing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Calcutta High Court quashed imposition of a 200% penalty on Bitumix India LLP for a violation related to an expired e-Way Bill. HC determined that while there was a violation, it was not grave enough to warrant such a high penalty. Instead, court directed appellants to pay a penalty of Rs. 50,000, which includes both CGST and WBGST.
Gujarat High Court dismissed the allegation of sale of High Speed Diesel to various private industries at concessional sales tax without complying with the mandatory requisite permission from the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. The said allegations were dismissed in absence of any evidence.
Karnataka High Court held that blocking order under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 blocking the tweets/accounts for an indefinite period are unassailable on the doctrine of proportionality.
Gujarat High Court held that factum of non-use and even handing over of tenancy and later resumption of possession was never in knowledge of Corporation. Further, valuation was undisputedly changed. Accordingly, the rate which was applicable at the relevant point of time is applied by the Corporation.
Calcutta High Court has granted a stay on initiation of reassessment proceedings beyond 6 years in case of RPC Commercial LLP. Court found that jurisdiction of assessing officer to issue notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act was barred by limitation under Section 149(1)(a)/(1)(b).
A comprehensive analysis of Udaan Hotels & Resorts vs Union of India case and its implications on disclosing assessment materials under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act.
Allahabad High Court held that the scope of decision u/s. 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act is limited to the existence or otherwise of information which suggests that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. The same would otherwise remain subject to reassessment order passed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that in respect of Special Audit remuneration under section 142(2D) of the Income Tax Act invocation of provisions of MSMED Act not tenable and completely misplaced. Accordingly, the Income Tax Act would thus prevail over the provisions of the MSMED Act.
Detailed review and analysis of the landmark judgment – Saturday Club Ltd Vs PCIT by Calcutta High Court concerning club income taxation and the principle of mutuality.
