Bombay High Court’s landmark ruling confirms that only the profit element of bogus purchases can be added to taxable income, emphasizing the requirement for reconciliation of stock in cases of alleged accommodation entries.
Calcutta High Court asserts that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination and failure to provide copies of evidence render an order invalid under the Income Tax Act.
Read the full text of the judgment by Punjab and Haryana High Court granting a refund of income tax on exempted disability pension income. Analysis of Circulars and Court Orders.
The Jharkhand High Court heard a petition seeking the quashing of a First Information Report (FIR) and the entire criminal proceeding against Mr. Anupam Kumar Pathak, proprietor of M/S Maa Mahamaya Enterprises, in connection with a case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion.
The Orissa High Court dealt with a writ petition challenging the 1st appellate order passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Jajpur Range, Odisha. The petitioner, Biswal Sales, sought to appeal the order, but the 2nd appellate tribunal had not been constituted yet.
Delhi High Court orders a fresh investigation in the Rajnish Yadav Vs ITO case, pertaining to allegations of bogus purchases under the Income Tax Act, citing lack of furnished information to the petitioner.
Court ruled that the funds in the Term Deposit Accounts were the income of the Government of India and exempt from TDS under Section 196 of the Act. Moreover, the JKSRRDA, being wholly financed by the Central Government, was also eligible for exemption under Notification No. 3489 dated 22.10.1970, despite not being registered under the Central Societies Registration Act.
In the case of Kothari Credit (India) Limited v. Union of India and others, the petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
In a significant ruling, the Rajasthan High Court mandates the issuance of ‘C’ forms for high-speed diesel procured for mining purposes via inter-state trade, offering a crucial legal perspective on the CST Act’s provisions.
The Kerala High Court rules in favor of Director of Income Tax in Sub Registrar vs Director of Income Tax, asserting that the bonafide impression of AIR submission by a predecessor isn’t a “reasonable cause” for 526-day delay.
