The Madras High Court orders the provisional release of a seized car and cash in the case of Eburamusa Sherif vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs. The court sets certain conditions for the release.
The petitioner would not have delayed the return as it was entitled for a refund. Cause of justice should not be defeated for technicalities.
In a recent judgment, the Allahabad High Court granted one month to the assessee, M/s Abhay Traders, to submit a reply to a vague and invalid show cause notice alleging bogus purchases.
In a significant ruling, the Jharkhand High Court finds that Revenue cannot issue fresh show cause notices for the same period after the accepted First Appellate Order. Learn more about the case and analysis.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition challenging the appointment of Commissioners of Income Tax (Appeals) stating that the Act of 1961 vests jurisdiction with the Central Government for such appointments.
Bombay HC sets aside tax refund rejection of Wallem Shipmanagement. Court cites COVID-19 disruptions and upholds principles of natural justice
Delhi High Court held that notification dated 05.04.2021 cannot be said as void in law as time for which the interim orders were operable has to be excluded from the timeframe provided in Rule 18 of of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of AntiDumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (AAD Rules).
Delhi High Court’s recent ruling addresses coaching centers in Mukherjee Nagar violating Master Plan for Delhi, 2021. Explore the judgment’s key points and implications for residents and institutes.
Orissa High Court held that 150 HP Fully Automatic ATS (Auto-Transformer Starter) Control Panel, Motor Starter Panel Board and other Control Panel is comprehended in the term “accessories” under OVAT Act which attracts a rate of tax @ 4% for the tax periods prior to 01.04.2012 and @5% for the tax periods commencing from 01.04.2012 to the periods of assessment.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court observed that Section 35FF of the Excise Act indicates that interest would commence from the date of the order of the Appellate Authority as distinct from the making of an application which is prescribed to be the starting point insofar as Section 11BB of the Act is concerned.
