Dive into the intricacies of GST order communication and service in the Baghel Trading Co. vs. State of U.P. case. Currently under review by the Allahabad High Court.
Madras High Court ruling in PMA Controls India Limited vs Joint Commissioner of Central Tax – important insights on Input Tax Credit transition under GST.
Delhi High Court held that New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) being a body corporate, the petitioner (service provider) was liable to pay service tax on works contract to the extent of 50%. Accordingly, the demand was set aside as 50% service tax was duly discharged.
Read the Madras High Court’s judgment directing the ITO to refund Rs.9,04,260 under Vivad se Vishwas Act and consider the petitioner’s representations.
In PCIT vs. Hellmann Worldwide Logistics India Pvt. Ltd case, Delhi High Court upholds appellate authorities’ right to choose a different transfer pricing method.
Bombay High Court’s ruling on anticipatory bail for an applicant accused of availing input tax credit without goods receipt under CGST Act
Read Jharkhand High Court’s judgment on Kamaladitya Construction’s case challenging a 7-year gap in show cause notice. Is it unreasonable? Find out.
Kerala High Court held that a trust, either private or public/charitable or otherwise, is a juristic person who is liable for punishment for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act).
Telangana High Court held that once sanction has been given to a particular authority, i.e., the Deputy Director of Income Tax, the prosecution has to be launched by him alone and not by the Assistant Director of Income Tax. Thus, the authority which has initiated the prosecution must have sanction of law. Otherwise, it amounts to illegal action.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the complainant miserably failed to prove the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 against the respondent/accused beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal dismissed.
