Allahabad High Court ruling clarifies that rejecting UP VAT books doesn’t automatically lead to Central Sales Tax rejection. Learn the detailed analysis and implications.
Allahabad High Court decision on UPVAT Rules – Stricter approach for exemptions/deductions. Full text of judgment and detailed analysis of Commissioner vs Sanya Construction case.
Kerala High Court nullifies Income Tax order against Anna Aluminium Company, citing violation of natural justice due to disregarding video conferencing hearing request. Full text of judgment included.
Read the Kerala High Court’s judgment annulling Income Tax Act Section 148A(d) order against Dinesh Dinakaran Pillai. Learn about the case and the court’s decision.
The crux of the petitioner’s argument rested on the alleged non-receipt of notice for the appeal hearing. Despite providing a postal address for their counsel, the petitioner claimed neither the counsel nor they received any intimation. The court, however, refuted this, emphasizing the automated system in place. Notices were not only uploaded on the portal but also sent via email and SMS alerts in real-time, using the details provided by the assessee.
The court emphasizes that the petitioner received eight notices under Section 142(1) and two show cause notices under Section 144. Despite ample opportunities, the petitioner did not respond or seek extensions. The court concludes that the petitioner cannot now claim a violation of natural justice, as there was substantial compliance.
Allahabad High Court judgment on Desai Brothers Limited Ratanpur vs. State of U.P. highlights Section 54, emphasizing interest remittance 60 days post refund application.
Read about the Kerala High Court’s dismissal of a writ petition seeking restoration of a Customs appeal. The court found the petition misconceived and not maintainable.
Read the Kerala High Court judgment on Parameswaran E. C. vs Assistant Commissioner, where writ petition challenging GST assessment orders is disposed of, allowing the petitioner to appeal within a month.
Telangana High Court’s landmark decision in M/s. A.S.E. India v. Union of India, highlighting invalidity of blocking ITC without a CGST Act Section 74 order or Rule 86A compliance.
