Bombay High Court held that in absence of change in law/ facts, advance ruling pronounced by the authority shall be binding on the application and also on the Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs and the customs authorities subordinate to him.
Bombay High Court held that action of the department in selling the gold during the pendency of the appeal is illegal and unconstitutional.
Delhi High Court held that the period of limitation for cases covered u/s. 49(a) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 would be six months from the date on which the stamp paper was spoiled. Accordingly, refund of 90% stamp duty directed.
Karnataka High Court held that reassessment proceedings cannot be in the nature of review and accordingly, the material as has come to light in the assessment proceedings for the Assessment Year 2008- 2009 cannot be a sufficient ground to resort to reassessment proceedings.
Bombay High Court held that benefit of exemption under notification no. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 available to loading, unloading, packing, storage or warehousing of “agricultural produce” namely “tea”.
Assessee-company was engaged in the business of providing unsecured short-term loans to its customers/borrowers in India via its Digital Application based platform called the ‘CashBean‟.
Since the claim for refund could not be withheld merely because the Department, pursuant to the deposit, issued the SCN and was proposing to demand GST.
Explore the confusion surrounding Section 271(1)(c) penalty in PCIT Vs Modi Rubber Ltd. (Delhi High Court). Lack of clarity on concealment or inaccurate particulars raises questions.
Explore the Delhi High Court judgment on Randa Chehab’s deportation. Understand the consequences of violating business visa conditions and the legal stance on blacklisting foreigners
Kerala High Court dismisses a writ petition challenging the CBDT circular on condonation of delay, upholding its authority to prescribe time limits for filing applications.
