Gauhati High Court held that industrial units which was not required to be registered under the Central Excise Act, either due to low threshold limit or as manufacturing goods that were exempted, cannot be denied benefit of budgetary support scheme.
Explore the Kerala High Court’s dismissal of Nahasshukoor’s writ petition, upholding CGST Act Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 36(4). Detailed analysis and conclusions provided.
Explore the legal battle in Kaysons Infrastructure vs CBIC as Calcutta High Court examines the validity of a GST notice. Learn about the alleged discrepancies, challenges raised, and the court’s interim order.
Bombay High Court held that if an irrelevant matter is not struck off in the notice, it indicates the AO’s uncertainty regarding the basis for imposing the penalty. Such ambiguity implies non-application of mind, rendering the notice invalid.
Karnataka High Court rules against income tax reassessment after 3 years. Case: Pramila Mahadev Tadkase Vs ITO. Details of the judgment and legal implications.
Brakes India Private Limited challenges GST assessment order. Madras High Court deems notice invalid due to inadequate personal hearing time. In-depth analysis and court’s directives.
Reassessment invalid for borrowed satisfaction, reasons to believe not adverting to the failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose truly and fairly all material facts, and also the change of opinion.
Karnataka High Court invalidates income tax assessment order citing incorrect email notices. Details of Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt Ltd Vs Assessment Unit case.
Final Assessment Order lacked jurisdiction, as it was issued without providing the petitioner with a draft Assessment Order under Section 144B(1)(xvi).
Allahabad High Court expressed displeasure over unpreparedness of standing counsel representing state government. Ccase involved Ram Verma v. State of U.P., and took note of standing counsel’s lack of preparation after around 10 minutes of argument.
