Karnataka HC reviews Sujal Pharma’s blacklisting by Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation. Key issues include lack of notice and principles of natural justice.
When the return is filed in the Telangana Portal and credit got transferred on the same day to Maharashtra portal, the department has no justifiable reason to deny the same or take action against the petitioner.
Madras High Court held that the entire stamp duty amount as demanded by the authorities has been paid even during the pendency of the appeal, hence demand of interest for belated payment unjustified.
Bombay HC in appeals by M/s. Tolani Ltd. clarifies that investment allowance under Section 32A can include additional costs attributable to exchange rate fluctuations post-acquisition.
Read the Madras High Court’s ruling on Lekshmi Marketing vs State Tax Officer, emphasizing decision-making processes over decision correctness. Learn about the case and the court’s directive to file an appeal before the GST Commissioner.
Madras High Court allows Solai Venkateshwara Stores to appeal GST assessment orders with 25% pre-deposit following a stock transfer dispute from a demolished godown.
Read the detailed analysis of Angalesh Marketing vs. Superintendent of GST & Central Excise case where Madras HC overturns an order due to non-response to show cause notice.
Karnataka HC directs re-adjudication of GST case as taxpayer’s hospitalization led to missing documents; allows for fresh consideration of government contract proofs.
Discover the detailed judgment of Madras High Court on Tvl.Jeyaprakash vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 regarding GST personal hearing notice and 10% pre-deposit.
Read the full judgment of Umang Mahendra Shah Vs Union of India by Bombay High Court, ruling that an order under Section 148A(d) without Section 151 sanction is unlawful. Learn more about the implications.
