Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All High Courts

HC lay down principles for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c)

December 13, 2012 8664 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of CIT Vs. Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory, Karnataka High Court has laid down the following Principles for levy of penalty Under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 :- (a) Penalty under Section 271(l)(c) is a civil liability.

Taxes or Surcharge Collected by Assessee from tenants will form part of Gross Rent

December 13, 2012 5939 Views 0 comment Print

Moment the commercial surcharge is recovered irrespective of the provisions of the agreement entered into by and between the landlord and tenant it immediately become exigible to tax as rental income from house property for agreement binds the parties thereto and it becomes irrelevant the moment it is found to be in conflict with legal provision on the subject.

Non-appearance by company in winding up proceeding could not be construed as mala fide and intentional

December 13, 2012 1596 Views 0 comment Print

The application made, for recalling the order dated 19th November, 2012, has failed to convince the Court to the fullest extent. The person sworn-in to the affidavit has stated that he was managing the affairs of the Company and he was in the Country for six months, itself, is not sufficient to recall the winding-up order. First of all, he should have stated as to how only he was responsible to file this affidavit when other Directors were available.

Sec. 80-IB – If both commercial and residential units are built, proportionate deduction to extent of compliance, would be allowed

December 13, 2012 3144 Views 0 comment Print

one cannot read any limitation into the expression housing project to mean the residential project alone and that if and when the projects have mixed built-up area of commercial and residential, the question of disallowance will arise only if and when the residential flats are beyond the limit as provided under sub clause (c) of Section 80-IB(10) of the Act and not otherwise.

Machinery kept ready for use, but no actually used are entitled to depreciation

December 13, 2012 4614 Views 0 comment Print

Some machinery and equipment relating to the construction of the projects were not actually put to use, though they were kept ready for use and this factual position is not in dispute.

‘Zarda Yukta Pan Masala’ is a tobacco preparation not eligible for deduction u/s. 80I

December 13, 2012 3340 Views 0 comment Print

In Item No. 1 of the list of articles or thing in Schedule XI, the items include beer, wine and other alcoholic spirits. The percentage of alcohol in the spirits is not given. With the same object the percentage of tobacco is also not given in ‘tobacco preparation’.

Seismic services taxable under specific s. 44BB not under general s. 44DA

December 13, 2012 1510 Views 0 comment Print

Section 44BB is a special provision for computing the profits and gains of a non-resident in connection with the business of providing services or facilities in connection with, or supplying plant and machinery on hire, used or to be used, in the prospecting for, or extraction or production of mineral oils including petroleum and natural gas. Section 44DA is also a provision which applies to non-residents only.

Winding up petition can be admitted on failure of respondent to argue his stand on non-admission of liability

December 12, 2012 513 Views 0 comment Print

The company cannot demonstrate that it had, contemporaneously or otherwise, complained of the goods supplied by the petitioner not adhering to any of the specifications stipulated in the purchase orders. Even the company’s grievance as to the size of the goods is not tenable since the purchase orders specified the size to be 0-1 mm.

S. 50C Addition on basis of mere stamp duty valuation without considering market price not justified

December 12, 2012 2836 Views 0 comment Print

Held that the provision of Section 50-C enabling the revenue to treat the value declared by an assessee for payment of stamp duty, ipso facto, cannot be a legitimate ground for concluding that there was undervaluation, in the acquisition of immovable property. If Parliamentary intention was to enable such a finding, a provision akin to Section 50-C would have been included in the statute book, to assess income on the basis of a similar fiction in the case of the assessee who acquires such an asset.

Allowability of Depreciation on Transfer of Business to wholly owned subsidiary?

December 11, 2012 14077 Views 0 comment Print

Section 170 of the Income Tax Act deals with succession to business, otherwise than on death. On a reading of Section 43(6)(c), Explanation 2 to the Section and Section 170 along with the fourth proviso to Section 32(1), we have no hesitation in agreeing with the assessee’s case that when the assessee transferred its B Unit to the 100% subsidiary company,

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031