Punjab & Haryana High Court rules assessees aren’t required to keep the department’s e-portal open at all times to track actions. Detailed judgment analysis provided.
In R. Krishnaprasad Vs Commissioner of Customs, Kerala High Court directs expeditious testing of Technical Grade Urea to avoid port detention, demurrage, and charges, ensuring swift resolution.
In case of S. Subramanian & Co Vs ITO, Madras High Court directs Assessing Officer (AO) to pass a fresh order as notices sent to petitioner’s email id, created by accountant, were not acknowledged.
Kerala High Court held that consideration received by the trustees for relinquishment of trusteeship in the Trust cannot be treated as a capital receipt for the purposes of assessing the same under the head of capital gains.
Delhi High Court held that conjoint reading of Section 56(2)(viib) read along with Rule 11UA(2), the option of choosing a method of valuation of shares stands vested solely in the hands of the assessee.
Discover the ruling by Himachal Pradesh High Court on Rule 99 of CGST Rules, 2017, mandating Form GST ASMT-10 notice before a show cause notice issuance.
In Eco Plus Steels Pvt. Ltd. vs State of U.P., the Allahabad High Court rejects confiscation & penalty based on estimation, citing lack of physical verification & undue delay.
Dive into the detailed analysis of Virat Agencies Vs State of U.P. case from the Allahabad High Court, covering objections, violation of natural justice, and the final verdict.
Explore the judgment of Vel Steel Tubes vs. Asst. Commissioner (ST) from Madras High Court, addressing the necessity of a personal hearing in GST assessment cases.
Review the judgment of Poddar Trading Company vs. Commissioner from Allahabad High Court regarding the challenge to penalty orders under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act.
