CESTAT Kolkata: Shri Vijay Kumar versus Commissioner of Central Excise – penalties under Customs Act section 112 deleted as no knowledge of gold concealed in bags.
Service Tax demands for residential complexes were set aside when the units were developed for personal use by the members of co-operative societies. This principle was upheld in various judgments cited by Saumya Developers, indicating that no Service Tax was payable on residential units created for personal use.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules in favor of Microsoft India, stating services rendered to overseas entity are exports, exempting from service tax.
Appellant’s relationship with CIL was one of sale/purchase on a principal-to-principal basis. Therefore, appellant could not be held liable for service tax under BAS.
Service tax demand on services from abroad before 18.4.2006 isn’t sustainable. Issuing authority must specify applicable sub-clause in notice.
CESTAT Delhi ruled that advertising expenses for post-import goods can’t be part of their value. Detailed analysis of Reliance Brands Luxury Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs case.
No Service Tax on Agreement with government for supply of water on the basis of volume of water drawn as same is not a case of assignment of right to use natural resources of government.
CESTAT Chennai rules re-determination of UAE car value using Australian prices invalid without contemporary imports. Full text of the CESTAT Chennai order.
Explore the CESTAT Delhi ruling on Weldon Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax, revealing no service tax liability on outbound tours. Full analysis provided.
CESTAT Delhi ruled demand based solely on ST-3 returns vs. trial balance differences unjustified without proof of taxable services. Detailed analysis & conclusion provided.
