This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
PIL against Mobile Gaming Apps- HC ask govt to treat PIL as representation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tarun Chandiok Vs Union of India & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Tarun Chandiok Vs Union of India & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
The instant PIL is related to some of the mobile gaming apps, which allegedly facilitate online gambling, that have been referred to in the petition such as Adda52 Poker, PokerStars, Zynga Poker, Teen Patti Gold, Poker Rummy and Texas Hold’em Poker. The petitioner has contended that these are games of chance and involve no skill and therefore, ought to be prohibited in accordance with the anti-gambling laws.
High Court states that, it is the case and also considering the fact that earlier also they have disposed of a petition of ...
