Case Law Details
Mankind Life Sciences Private Limited Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr (Himachal Pradesh High Court)
The legal landscape surrounding the priority of dues in cases involving secured creditors and government departments has been a matter of judicial scrutiny. A recent case, Mankind Life Sciences Private Limited Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr, heard in the Himachal Pradesh High Court, delves into the intricate interplay between the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and other relevant statutes.
Background: The primary issue under consideration was whether the dues of secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act should take precedence over the dues of the Central Excise Department. The court referred to the judgment in Punjab National Bank vs. Union of India & Ors (2022) 7 SCC 260, where the Supreme Court held that secured creditors have the first charge on secured assets, and the provisions of the SARFAESI Act override those of other laws.
Precedents and Legal Analysis
1. Dena Bank vs Bhikhabhai Prabhu Dass Parikh & Anr. [(2000) 5 SCC 694]: The court referred to this case to establish that the Crown’s preferential right of recovery of debts does not extend to secured creditors. The judgment highlighted that the principles of common law do not grant the Crown preferential rights over a mortgagee or pledgee of goods or a secured creditor.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
