The Tribunal held that the incorrect carry-forward loss claim arose from an inadvertent mistake and was not deliberate. The penalty was deleted after noting absence of concealment or inaccurate particulars.
The Chennai Tribunal upheld penalties against custodians, steamer agents, and employees for removing seized goods without permission, confirming accountability under the Customs Act.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition, confirming the petitioner’s repatriation under DOPT OM 17-06-2010. The CAT’s findings on unsuitability and compliance with notice requirements were upheld.
The Tribunal ruled that an addition of Rs. 25 lakh was unjustified as the genuineness of a cash deposit from agricultural land sale was established, despite minor errors in affidavit.
CESTAT Delhi upheld a ₹10 lakh penalty on a customs broker for filing benami Shipping Bills without exporter authorization, confirming liability for mis-declared goods.
NCLAT ruled that GST dues of a corporate debtor, once admitted in CIRP, transform into operational debt, allowing assignment to a private creditor. The appeal challenging the debt transfer was dismissed.
The DRAT set aside the DRT order directing the bank to update credit information, ruling that former directors and guarantors cannot reopen withdrawn loan proceedings to alter CIBIL records.
The petitioner challenged an Income Tax Order under Sections 144/144B for failure to respond to notices. The Madras HC allowed a fresh opportunity to submit replies and documents, directing compliance and a charitable payment.
The appellate tribunal restrained the bank from taking physical possession of the property until disposal of the pending application or the three-month period, ensuring fair treatment of the appellant.
The Tribunal held that the Stainless Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2016 was not in force at the time of shipment in January 2017. The import was cleared as BIS marking was not required, setting aside previous confiscation orders.
