Follow Us:

Hotels / restaurants can Sale mineral water above MRP: SC

December 18, 2017 5073 Views 0 comment Print

Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Association of India (Supreme Court of India); Hon’ble SC held that that neither the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 read with the enactment of 1985, or the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, would apply so as to interdict the sale of mineral water in hotels and restaurants at prices […]

Applicability of time-limit U/s. 153(2A) when ‘assessment’ is set aside and an ‘assessment order’ being set aside

December 17, 2017 26973 Views 0 comment Print

In other words, in all instances of an assessing officer having to pass a fresh assessment order upon remand where section 153(2A) would apply, the assessing officer would be bound to follow the time-limit imposed by sub-section (2A). Where the assessing officer was only giving effect to an appellate order, then section 153(3)(ii) of the Act would apply.

Receipt of alimony from ex-husband is nothing but Gift and is exempt

December 17, 2017 7632 Views 0 comment Print

In our view, no law prevents such a lump sum payment by a husband to his wife in lieu of her maintenance for the whole life. In the proviso to section 56(2)(vi) any sum received from a relative is exempt from tax. In the definition of relative, the receipt from whom is exempt under the Act, inter alia not only the spouse but the brother and sister of the spouse have also been included.

CIT cannot treat AO’s order as erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue without conducting an enquiry and recording a finding

December 16, 2017 2451 Views 0 comment Print

For the purposes of exercising jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue had to be preceded by some minimal inquiry. In fact, if the ld. PCIT is of the view that the AO did not undertake any inquiry, it becomes incumbent on the LD. PCIT to conduct such inquiry.

Capital gain chargeable only on transferor and not on transferee: No Tax on firm on crediting Revaluation Surplus to Retiring Partners A/c

December 16, 2017 4590 Views 0 comment Print

Mahul Construction Corporation Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In this case The AO wants to tax the amount credited in capital a/c of retiring as well as continuing partners within the realm of 45(4) of the Act. So far as amount credited to capital a/c of retiring partners is concerned, notwithstanding the fact that there is […]

Section 13(3) : ITAT upheld exemption to trust who received grant from ABN AMRO Foundation & RBS Bank India

December 16, 2017 9879 Views 0 comment Print

ADIT Vs. M/s. RBS Foundation India (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee is a limited share registered company under section 25 of the Act and is a separate and independent legal entity wherein RBS Bank India or ABN AMRO Foundation, Netherlands are neither the shareholders nor the promoters of the assessee. The assessee company has been formed with […]

Order of AO not become erroneous merely because PCIT feels that further inquiry should have been made

December 16, 2017 1491 Views 0 comment Print

M/s Amira Enterprises Ltd. Vs. The Pr. C.I.T. (ITAT Delhi) The assessee had filed various replies to the ld. PCIT in response to notice u/s of the Act 263 of the Act stating that all the issues raised by the PCIT have been examined by the AO during the course of assessment. The PCIT has […]

TDS on AMC of medical equipments by Hospital- Section 194C or Section 194J?

December 15, 2017 26517 Views 1 comment Print

Expenditure on account of AMC of medical equipments etc., is not in the nature of fee for professional and technical services as construed under section 194J of the Act and hence, not liable to deduct TDS under section 194J of the Act. The assessee has deducted TDS under section 194C of the Act in regard to payments on AMC of medical equipments and machines etc.

Assessee registered under STPI as a 100% EOU can claim deduction u/s 10B despite non approval by Board as 100% EOU

December 15, 2017 2079 Views 0 comment Print

While dismissing revenue’s appeal, the Hyderabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has declared that assessee is entitled for deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act 1961 even though it registered as a hundred percent Export Oriented Undertaking (EOU) under the Software Technology Park of India (STPI).

Mere instance of reduction in shares of profit of a partner resulting in increase in share of profit of another by itself will not constitute a ‘gift’

December 15, 2017 2253 Views 0 comment Print

A division bench of the Kerala High Court recently held that a mere reduction in the shares of one partner, resulting in proportionate increase of shares of another partner would constitute a gift for the purpose of taxation under Section 4 (1) (a) of the Income Tax Act.

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930