In our considered view only a percentage of profit embedded in such amount of contractual receipts can be brought to tax. In this regard we find support and guidance from the order of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. President Industries reported in 258 ITR 654 where it was directed to make the addition only to the extent of gross profit of undisclosed business receipts.
Sasi Enterprises Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee received refund of Rs.3.70 Lacs from one Mrs. Nagammal. In support, the assessee produced confirmation letter given by Shri P.V.Padmanadhan (son of deceased Mrs. Nagammal). It was stated that Mrs. Nagammal entered into an agreement for sale of 25 acres of land and received advance of Rs. […]
Global Healthline Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The first issue relates to disallowance of sum of Rs.20,83,340/- on account of credit card commission under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. It is the case of the assessee that provisions of Section 194H are not attracted having regard to nature of such expenses. It is contended […]
Punabhai G. Pardava Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Assessee contended that the disallowance should be restricted to the tune of 30% of the rent paid under the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) read with section 194-I of Income Tax Act. The amendment was brought by the Finance Act (No. 2) 2014 effective from 1-4-2015 whereas the year […]
Ramesh Verma Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow) ITAT held that Reading clause (e) of the first proviso to section 43(5), and sections 70(1) and 73(1) of the I.T. Act together, it emerges that in the assessee’s case, since a derivatives commodity trading transaction is not a speculative transaction, loss arising therefrom can very well be set […]
ITAT held that miscellaneous expenses Paid Through Cheques Based On Self-Made Voucher Allowable for the purpose of business are allowable.
Section 273B of the Act provides that the penalty u/s 271B need not be imposed if there is a reasonable cause for the said failure.
Section 11 – Power of adjustment cannot be exercised for demand of tax/interest/penalty which is sub judice by Central Excise officers.
Merely because a note was given in the balance sheet of the appellant company that the service recipient’s company is an Associates Company of the appellant does not alter the legal status of independent entity of both the companies.
City Manager Association Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Let us consider the scope of section 154 for making prima facie adjustment while processing return under section 143(1)(a) of the Act i.e. process of dealing with the return is an ex parte process. It is pertinent to observe that whenever any debatable issue is […]
