Notice calling for suggestions, views, comments, feedback etc. from stakeholders on draft rules pertaining to Customs Valuation of imported goods in terms of recent amendment in Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 vide Section 89 of the Finance Act, 2022 Attention is invited to the recent amendment made in Section 14 of the Customs […]
Instruction No. 26/2022-Customs – Requirement of Health Certificate to be accompanied with the import of certain food consignments – modification of Board Instruction No.18/2022-Customs F. No. 401/66/2022-Cus-III Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs) North Block, New Delhi Instruction No. 26/2022-Customs | Dated the 6th October, […]
CBIC notifies Customs Exchange rate for Import & Export wef 7th October, 2022 vide Exchange rate Notification No. 87/2022-Cus (NT) dated 06.10.2022 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS New Delhi ***** Notification No. 87/2022 – Customs (N.T.) | Dated: 6th October, 2022 In exercise of […]
JCIT Vs Shree Ganesh Construction (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is observed that even though the original receipt for payment of donation of Rs.50,000/- made to Chief Minister Kanya Kelvani Nidhi was not produced by the assessee as the same was lost or misplaced, sufficient evidence was produced by the assessee to support and substantiate its claim […]
DCIT Vs Ferrero India Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Pune) The main contention that was advanced by the assessee in this case before the Tribunal was that the existence of international transaction cannot be inferred by the T.P.O in the absence of any actual transaction and the presumption by the lower authorities that the benefit had endured […]
In other words, the test would be: Does an ATM fulfil the functions of a Computer in the business activity of an assessee? Is it a tool of his trade with which it carries on his business?
Explore Angalakshmi Spinning Mill vs ITO ITAT Chennai case. ITAT allows spare parts replacement as revenue expenditure. Full text of ITAT Chennai order.
Manibhadra Securities Services P.Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) he assessee in the present case is a private limited company and engaged in the business of trading of Shares and Securities. The assessee in the year under consideration has received the Loan to the tune of Rs. 4,08,01,000/-from M/s Ken Securities Limited. The assessee has repay […]
Keshav Kanshkar A Class Electrical Contractor Vs Principal Secretary Department of Energy (Madhya Pradesh High Court) ‘Precedent’, refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar issues. ‘Precedent’, is incorporated into the doctrine of ‘stare decisis’, and requires courts to apply the law […]
Bhartiya City Developers Pvt. Ltd Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) A conspectus of Explanation-1 to Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, makes it clear that the statute visualizes the assessment proceedings and penalty proceedings to be wholly distinct and independent of each other. While the Assessing Officer may be justified in making estimated disallowance in quantum […]
