Comprehensive review and implications of the CESTAT Ahmedabads decision in the Modest Infrastructure Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case.
Delve into the landmark judgment of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India. Unravel the emphasis on principles of natural justice and the consequences on the Indian Income Tax Act.
Unravel the ruling of the Delhi High Court in the Vodafone Roaming Services Sarl Vs ACIT case. Understand the implications of the court’s verdict on the disputed income tax assessment order.
ITAT Mumbai concurred with AO and CIT(A), highlighting that a Board Resolution doesn’t create a liability until implemented. The tribunal emphasized that costs for employee termination and lease termination arise when notice of termination is served.
Unraveling the case of Gopal Singh vs ITO, in which ITAT calls out the disregard of quasi-judicial authority. Understand the key facts, analysis, and implications of this significant ITAT ruling.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in the case of Nikhil Suryakant Shah vs ITO. The ITAT has deleted the addition for deemed interest on a loan given by the director to the company. Get the analysis and conclusion here.
Explore the CESTAT’s recent ruling in the case of Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills vs Commissioner of Central Excise, where the tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for Educational Cess due to its exclusion in the area-based exemption notification.
Learn about CESTAT’s recent ruling in the Aricent Technologies case, which validates the grant of CENVAT credit even when service-exporting premises are not registered under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules.
Read about ITAT Delhi’s important ruling in the Hyderabad Distilleries and Wineries Pvt Ltd case, confirming that income from lease rent and packaging charges in manufacturing services is treated as business income.
ead the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order in the case of Commissioner, Namakkal Municipality Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise. The case deals with the imposition of penalties and interest on service tax retrospectively. The CESTAT Chennai sets aside the interest and penalties, citing the retrospective amendment and the principle of non-ex post facto penalties.
