In re Ms. Subramani Sumathi (GST AAR Tamilnadu) What is the rate of tax for the vadams made of maida and what is the HSN Code’ The issue to be decided before us is the rate of tax applicable to the product of the Applicant and the applicable HSN Code. From the various submissions of […]
In re Ms. Dream Runners Foundation (GST AAR Tamilnadu) i. Whether the conduct of marathon events by the Trust through which donations are raised for charity is an exempted service under GST? The conduct of Marathon event by the Applicant for the participants is a not an exempt supply under CGST/TNGST Act ii. When the […]
Where special auditor was appointed under section 142(2A) at fag-end of expiry of limitation to pass assessment order and for sole purpose of extending limitation period for assessment order, i.e., just before 23 days in expiry limitation under section 153(1) such appointment was illegal and invalid therefore, to be quashed.
These Regulations may be called the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Insurance Brokers) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2018.
In re Ms. Animal Feed Analytical and Quality Assurance Laboratory (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Whether services related to rearing of all life forms of animals by way of testing include testing of Animal Feeds, Feed ingredients and Feed supplements used to make feeds are covered under Notification No. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate)? The services provided by […]
In re Kara Property Ventures LLP (GST AAR Tamilnadu) What is the value of supply of services provided in terms of the provisions of CGST ACT 2017 read with Notification No.11/2017- Central Tax (Rate) ? The value of supply of services provided by the Applicant in the project ‘One Crest’ in Chennai, wherein the Applicant […]
Any view expressed by the Board in Circular No. 10/2018 shall be considered to have never been expressed and accordingly, the said circular shall not be taken into account by any Income-tax authority in any proceedings under the Act.
Maharastra Film Cultural Development Corporation Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Oxford University Press (108 ITR 166) has expounded that the test for judging the nature of capital or revenue expenditure is to see whether as a result of expenditure what is being done is to […]
Where AO had failed to issue notice under section 143(2) before completion of assessment, addition made under section 68 during reassessment proceedings was deleted because issuance of notice under section 143(2) is a mandatory obligation on the part of AO.
PR. CIT Vs Green Delhi BSQ Ltd. (Delhi High Court) The respondent-assessee was to construct, operate and maintain bus shelters. The respondent-assessee was also under an obligation to pay Rs.4.09 crores per month to the Delhi Transport Corporation. The shelters were not owned by the respondent-assessee. The Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No. […]
