Notification No. 10/2019-Customs amends notification No. 69/2011-Customs dated 29.07.2011 to extend deeper tariff concessions to imports of specified goods from Japan under India-Japan CEPA (IJCEPA) with effect from 1st April, 2019. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) Notification No. 10/2019-Customs New Delhi dated the 28th March, 2019 G.S.R. 245(E).– In exercise of the […]
It is evident from the above that the Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the Applicants as well as the rest 64 purchasers of flats in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus realized more price from them than what he was entitled to charge and has also compelled them to pay more GST than what they were required to pay
Casa Grande Co-Operative Housing Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai) When any provision in the statute has been held to be unconstitutional, refund of tax under such statute will be outside the scope and purview of such enactment and under such circumstances, refund can be claimed by way of a suit or by way of a […]
Pr. CIT Vs. Macquarie Global Services Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) The respondent-assessee had set up a new unit in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) income from which was claimed as exempt under Section 10AA of the Act for a period of ten years commencing from the Assessment Year 2010-11. Exemption was allowed in the Assessment […]
Notification No. 14/2019-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) Principal Director General, Revenue Intelligence, hereby appoints officers mentioned in column (5) of the Table below to act as a common adjudicating authority
SFIO Vs Rahul Modi (Supreme Court of India) 1. Leave granted. 2. These Appeals challenge the correctness of the common interim order dated 20.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Crl.) Nos.3842 and 3843 of 2018. 3. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies […]
Ms. Edelweiss Capital Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) From the record, we found that assessee was carrying out business of commodity trading on un-recognised exchange and also business of trading in shares. Assessee has claimed set off of loss arising out of trading in shares against the income arising out of trading in commodities. The […]
Roshan Lal Verma Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) In the present case the notice under Section 143(2) was issued to the assessee which is not the mandatory requirement under the provisions of Section 153A of the Act. As per Section 153A, simple notice has to be given to the assessee. Thus, the contention of the Ld. […]
The Government of India has desired that all government transactions done by agency banks for Financial Year 2018-19 must be accounted for within the same financial year and has requested that, as in previous years, certain special arrangements be made for this purpose.
In re Innovative Textile Ltd. (GST AAR Uttarakhand) Whether business transfer agreement as a going concerned on slump sale basis is exempted from the levy of GST in terms of sl. no. 2 of the notification no. 12/2017 central tax (Rate) dated 28-06-2017? From the record we find that the applicant is carrying on the […]
