High Court of Madras in the matter of Commissioner of CGST v. M/s. Daejung Moparts Pvt. Ltd. [W.A.Nos.2127 and 2151 of 2019] dated 23.07.2019 dismissed the Letter Patent Appeal filed by the department and upheld the order of single bench, whereby assessee was directed to pay interest consequent to delay in filing of Return, only on net tax liability (after deduction of Input Tax Component).
M/s. Voith Turbo Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Explains when Substantial mark-up in supply of imported goods to customers when not indicates undervaluation of imports Considering the nature of business of the appellant/importer and that the overheads involved in the business activity were bound to influence the price at which the […]
The Press Note No. 17 (1984) series regarding Environmental clearance of Industrial Licence- conditions of Letter of Intent/Industrial Licence, relates to pre-1991 period. After the Industrial Policy Resolution 1991, and considering various amendments made to Notification No. 477(E) dated 25th July, 1991 only the following four Industries are covered under compulsory licensing:
Petitioner is seeking directions to respondents to refund late fee collected from him while filing Form GSTR-3B in his Cash Ledger in GST Portal so that he can utilise it for discharging his tax liabilities.
The Applicant, however, vide their letter dated 04.09.2019 have requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling quoting the reason that the questions raised in their application were based on Place of Supply and also sale & shipment of the aircraft has already been completed.
Everyone rushes to drill the well and if they know that the well is about to dry they will rush more to get those last drops. Moratorium banns to drill the wells which are about to dry. Moratorium is said to be the main plank of the rescue culture.
Clarification on difficulties faced by candidates in on-line submission of application forms for appearing in CA exams to be held in November 2019 It has been brought to our notice that some candidates are experiencing difficulty in submission of exam forms on-line for appearing in CA exams to be held in November 2019. In this […]
DCIT Vs M/s. DLF Assets Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) On the aspect of disallowance made by the Ld. AO by invoking the provisions u/s 14A of the Act r/w Rule 8D (2) (ii) of the Rules, it is the submission of the Ld. AR that the interest expenses net of interest income may be considered […]
Explore the legal battle: Anupam Saraph vs. UIDAI. The dispute over Aadhaar data security, personal information, and disclosure regulations. Central Information Commission’s decision analyzed.
The assessee had challenged reopening of assessment on two grounds. The CIT(A) had accepted the arguments of the assessee, in light of provisions of section 147 of the Act, and the assessment order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) of the Act, dated 29/12/2018 and came to the conclusion that the assessment has been reopened on change of opinion without there being any tangible material, in the possession of the AO, which suggest escapement of income.
